🎉 SALE OFF 10% (12 Dec - 12 Jan)

Dedicated Team (T&M)

A dedicated team model for fast iteration and ongoing delivery. Backlog-driven execution, transparent reporting, Definition of Done, and disciplined change management.

Overview

Dedicated Team (T&M) provides a stable delivery team while allowing scope to evolve based on priorities. It's ideal for product development, iterative rollouts, and long-term enhancements.

Best fit

  • Requirements are not fully stable yet
  • You need fast validation before committing to a full build
  • Technical feasibility is uncertain (integrations, data, performance, AI/OCR, etc.)
  • You want a clear Phase 2 roadmap and budget range

Not the best fit

  • Scope and acceptance criteria are fixed → Fixed Scope Delivery
  • You need continuous feature delivery over time → Dedicated Team (T&M)
  • You primarily need production support and SLAs → Maintenance & SLA

Advantages

  • +Flexibility: Strong adaptation to scope changes (adjusted via backlog)
  • +Speed: Fast contract renewal and team scaling
  • +Continuous improvement: Unified operations, improvements, and additional development
  • +Cost optimization: Assign only needed roles for required duration

Disadvantages (Caution points)

  • Without clear definition of 'what and how far,' outcomes can become vague
  • Slow decision-making increases wait time and reduces productivity
  • Lack of governance causes quality and schedule fluctuations

Basic Principles (How it works)

  • Backlog (priority list) as the base, executed in sprints
  • Weekly meetings + minutes to fix decisions and eliminate ambiguity
  • Risk log / issue management to visualize delay factors
  • Quality gates (review, test points, DoD) defined upfront

Roles & Responsibilities (RACI Concept)

Client Side (Recommended)

  • Product Owner (Priority decision-maker)
  • Business Lead (Requirements alignment, operational decisions)
  • Acceptance Lead (UAT/Sign-off)

ARIS Side

  • PM/BrSE: Progress management, issue clarification, consensus building, risk management
  • Tech Lead: Design governance, review, technical decisions
  • Dev: Implementation, unit testing, fixes
  • QA: Test design, regression, quality visualization

※ Lab fails if 'Decision Owner' is unclear. We define this explicitly upfront.

Deliverables

Lab model emphasizes operational outcomes over fixed deliverables. Standard deliverables include:

  • Backlog (priority, estimates, status: started/completed)
  • Lightweight specifications (user stories / screen & IF notes / change points)
  • Weekly reports (progress, next week plan, issues, risks)
  • Release notes (changes / impact / procedures)
  • Test evidence (test points, results, regression status)
  • Operations documentation (Runbooks as needed)

Quality & Change Management (Common Lab pitfalls)

Change Management (CR Operations)

  • Changes incorporated into 'Backlog,' showing priority and impact (effort/risk)
  • Prohibit ad-hoc additions; make outcomes visible

Quality Control (DoD)

  • Definition of Done (DoD): Reviewed, tested, log/exception handling, documentation updated, etc.
  • Regression test policy: Automate critical functions in stages (if possible)

Common Failure Patterns & Countermeasures (ARIS Proposal)

Failure 1: No backlog / priorities flip constantly

Team repeats 'start → pause,' velocity drops

✓ Countermeasures:

  • Standardize backlog operations (priority, acceptance criteria, DoD)
  • Fix priorities weekly (schedule decision meetings)

Failure 2: Verbal spec changes, effort evaporates

Additional work increases, progress invisible

✓ Countermeasures:

  • Mandate CR (change management) even if simplified (impact: effort/deadline/risk)
  • Keep minutes + decisions + change history

Failure 3: No quality agreement, many reworks

Test phase collapses, deadlines extend

✓ Countermeasures:

  • Agree on quality gates (review/test policy/acceptance criteria) upfront
  • Visualize KPIs (bug leakage rate, recurrence rate, lead time) in monthly reports

Failure 4: Velocity not measured, planning impossible

Unknown timeline / cannot explain

✓ Countermeasures:

  • Record completion volume per sprint (velocity)
  • Improve forecast accuracy in 2–3 sprints
  • Report 'achieved/next month plan/risks' monthly in fixed format

Failure 5: Weak Japanese-side contact, communication breakdown

Misalignment, indecision, crisis

✓ Countermeasures:

  • Place Japanese-speaking contact/PM (or BrSE)
  • Standard: weekly meetings + minutes + risk log operations

Failure 6: Build without considering operations/maintenance, problems later

Cannot trace root causes during incidents / knowledge silos

✓ Countermeasures:

  • Design logging policy and minimal monitoring early
  • Start with minimal Runbook, grow monthly
  • Establish release procedures and rollback policy

Reference Packages (4 Types)

Lab development operation models (typical examples)

Type A: Development Lab (New/Additional development focus)

  • 2-week or 4-week sprint for dev/demo/release
  • Backlog-driven continuous improvement

Type B: Maintenance + Improvement Lab (Operations & minor fixes combined)

  • L1–L3 + minor fixes handled by same team
  • End-to-end: incident response → prevention → improvement proposals

Type C: Upstream-involved Lab (Heavy requirements / many stakeholders)

  • Thicker PM/BA for requirements organization and design review
  • Strengthen CR operations to support consensus building

Type D: QA-led Lab (For SaaS / continuous releases)

  • Continuous test design, automation, regression testing
  • Structure to maintain 'non-stop' release quality

Standard Governance (Minimum essentials)

  • Weekly meetings (30–60 min) + minutes
  • Backlog management (Jira, etc.) + priority confirmation
  • Risk/issue log (Owner/deadline/status)
  • Change management (CR)
  • Monthly report (progress/quality/KPI/next month plan)
PackageMM/month est.Team structure exampleSuitable for
Mini Lab1 MMComtor + Dev 1Small fixes / continuous improvement startup
Standard Lab2–3 MMComtor + TL/Dev + QAMVP improvement, stable feature additions
Growth Lab4–6 MMBrSE/PM/BA + TL + Dev×2 + QAMultiple features in parallel, speed-focused
Enterprise Lab7+ MMBrSE/PM/BA + Comtor + TL + Dev×multiple + QA + (Ops)Multiple products / large-scale operations

Options (As needed)

  • + UI/UX (Figma)
  • + Test automation (regression test setup)
  • + Operations (monitoring/backup/incident response)
  • + Security checklist application

※ Unit price, minimum period, working hours (JST support, etc.) designed separately according to your company policy.

Why ARIS / Strengths (ARIS Vietnam)

1) Operational design familiar with Japanese processes

We build in 'operations' for crucial Japanese elements: minutes, issue clarification, consensus building, change management.

2) Management that survives spec changes (Backlog × CR)

Prevent 'scope creep,' visualize priorities and impacts to support decision-making.

3) Standardized delivery quality (Review standards + DoD)

In Labs prone to individual dependencies, we align design/implementation/testing standards for stable quality.

4) Continuous improvement with operations/maintenance in mind

We create improvement cycles considering not only short-term dev efficiency but also operational load, incidents, and prevention.

Build a delivery structure that produces continuous results on the premise of requirement changes.

Contact Us

Frequently Asked Questions

Fixed Scope fixes deliverables/scope; Lab fixes the team and flexibly changes scope based on priorities.

Commonly start with 1–3 months for setup, then continue with ongoing contracts once operations stabilize.

Changes are managed via backlog, visualizing priority and impact. The key isn't 'increase' but deciding 'what to stop/postpone' through operations.

In Lab, we confirm results (demo, acceptance) monthly/per sprint, building consensus incrementally. We can also define acceptance criteria (DoD) if needed.

Not essential for small scale, but for the Japanese market, having PM/BrSE improves success rate from consensus-building and change-management perspectives.

Yes. It's common to adopt a 'hybrid' approach: Cut out stabilized requirements as Fixed Scope, continue improvement in Lab.

Dedicated Team (T&M) | Flexible delivery for evolving requirements and continuous improvement | ARIS Vietnam